Has It Got The X Factor Back? Part 2

After writing about day one of boot camp it seemed only fitting to have a bash at day two. Sadly, I don’t have any great insights to offer. Sorry about that.

I quite enjoyed it, although I did whizz through it all rather quickly. The points of interest were:

1) Simon did a lot of nodding.

2) ‘No one wants it more than…’ This phrase was used to describe at least thirty of the final fifty. Surely, it can only be used once.

3) John and Edward went through. Louis got the groups. These two facts cannot be a coincidence.

4) Simon is going to take some beating with the over-25 category, they look very strong.

5) Have I mentioned that The Xtra Factor is the better show? Get watching it.

6) There was literally no tension when they brought the acts on stage to see who went through. It was blatantly obvious which ones were which.

Next week is judges’ houses and I’m vaguely looking forward to it. Result.

Has It Got The X Factor Back?

Despite being an fan of The X Factor in previous years, this time out has left me cold.  I half heartedly watched the first two weeks and then for the next three I didn’t watch at all.  I’m not entirely sure what that is down to; the change to having a live audience at the initial auditions was a terrible decision, which changed the whole feel of the show, but I don’t know if it is down to more than that.  I think I’ve just about reached my limit of being able to watch bad auditions and seeing people being humiliated; this happening in front of a baying crowd has only highlighted the cruelty.  Perhaps, I’ve just fallen out with the show all together.

Last night’s episodes were the first of the boot camp stage and so it felt an appropriate time to give it another go and see if I could salvage my love for cheesy talent shows.  It’s not a good start.  There’s a full ten minutes of padding before anything  actually happens and I’m thankful that I had Sky Plussed it.   This is perhaps a bit of a harsh criticism as it’s always been full of padding.  In my post from last Novemeber, X-Rated, I revealed that I managed to watch the four televised hours of X Factor shows one Saturday night in 90 minutes – and that was with me paying attention.

Eventually, they did get around to some singing, and the first batch of  auditionees that they showed were absolutely awful.  How they got through the first  round is anybody’s guess.  I can only assume that presence of the live audience skewed the judges objectivity.  With the dross out of the way, we did manage to see some better singers, although not recognising many of the contestants meant that I didn’t feel very  invested in whether they went through or not.

It was vaguely amusing to see John and Edward again, but within about 30 seconds the joke fell flat, they’re just a pair of cocks.  It’s one thing to be ‘shit but funny’, but the identical twins were just plain old shit.  Remarkably, they didn’t get booted out right away because Louis liked them.  Unsurprisingly, they were Irish.

At this stage, I was still pretty uninterested and a fair amount of fast  forwarding happened.  Before I know it they announce who is in the top 50.  Like every other year we get to see scenes of  the successful jumping up and down like chimps and the unsuccessful crying like they’ve just been told that their dog is dead.  These bits are equally annoying every year.

Over on ITV2, The Xtra Factor remains the superior show and Holly Willoughby remains exceptionally lovely.  Apart from her obvious loveliness, I think that she is one of the best presenters currently on TV and has made the show her own.  She’s so good that I’m getting increasingly worried that she’ll be promoted to the main show, which would be good for her bank balance but would be the viewers loss; the presenter of the ITV1 programme really has so little to do.

Overall, I definitely enjoyed ‘Boot Camp’ more than any of the earlier shows, so perhaps things are looking up.  There does seem to be some very strong competitors this year, but then it seems that way every year and by the time it gets to the live shows most of them turn crap.  We’ll have to wait and see.  Part two of boot camp is tonight, so I’ll see you there.

True Blood Survivors Group

Over on the comments section on excellent TV blog, Unpopcult, a trend has emerged regarding vampire drama True Blood.  It seems that a large number of people are watching the whole of True Blood season one, on FX, despite not really liking it.  I’m committing this act of insanity myself.

I want to be cured, and I can only assume that others feel the same way, which is why I am launching the True Blood Survivors Group.  We’re here to help you, comfort you and support you.  If you follow our twelve-step plan you too can stop watching this boring drama serial.

Every one of our members will be assigned a sponsor, a former True Blood watcher who has managed to learn not to watch a TV programme that they don’t like.  They can pass on the secrets to you, and help you through those dark moments when you can’t bring yourself to delete the series link on Sky Plus.

Join today – If you’re interested, leave a comment below.

The Soap Effect

Way back in my post, Gone West (Wing), I first mentioned ‘The Soap effect’ – the way in which watching a long running series can destroy your objectivity – and thought it was about time I looked at it in some more depth.  I’ve attempted to define the phenomenon:

The lack of objective opinion on a long running serial story brought about by prolonged exposure to that same serial.  This also incorporates the reluctance to cease watching\reading a long running serial story line because of a false sense of loyalty induced by prolonged exposure to the previously mentioned serial.

In the UK this effect is most clearly seen in the prime time soaps themselves and it isn’t surprising that these are our highest rated shows.  This isn’t exactly a ground-breaking revelation.  Where I think it becomes interesting is in relation to US television.  American TV seems to be undergoing a golden era, and there are undoubtedly lots of quality shows being made.   There also seems to be a more loyal fan base for lots of ‘cult’ shows at the moment, but how good are some of these shows really?  I think the fact that many US TV shows have seasons of 20+ episodes, and that they often have a strong serial element has vastly over inflated the stock of some programmes.

My anecdotal ‘evidence’ for this theory comes directly from my own viewing habits.  Since getting in to shows like The Wire and Battlestar Galactica years after they started I have become ever more vigilant in recording the opening episodes of new US TV shows.   Some of them are deleted almost instantly, like recent examples Harper’s Island and Warehouse 13, but some are watched and the series stuck with, with little enthusiasm.   Sometimes you can be two seasons in to a programme before you realise you don’t actually like it.  As a pop culture addict, there is a fear of missing out on ‘the next big thing’.

I mentioned in Gone West (Wing) that I had an early encounter with TSE with Star Trek: The Next Generation, a show that I can’t even bear to be on the screen these days.  Another example would be mega-popular ‘sitcom’, Friends.  The few episodes that I saw of the early seasons I absolutely loathed, and it seemed to be the antithesis of everything I look for in a comedy.  It seemed to consist of nothing more than six inordinately good-looking people sat around in a coffee shop, each taking turns in delivering yawn-inducing ‘zingers’.   Somehow though, I started watching the show regularly around season five and watched them all through to the end, in season 10.  I suppose I must have warmed to the show a little, but I seriously have no idea why I watched it.  It possibly had something to do with fancying Jennifer Aniston, but that could hardly justify 6 seasons of a show you don’t like.  The thing is, I never watched it and saw it as a comedy show, more of a mildly amusing soap opera about totally unrealistic twenty\thirty-somethings.  Just the thought of watching it depresses me.

There are other shows where the concept of ‘loyalty’ and investment have kicked in.   I started watching Heroes as a life-long comic book fan, and found it rather mediocre.  It did, however, have a strong serial element and, unusually, had a decent pay off to season one, and no annoying cliffhanger, this being enough for me to look forward to the programmes future.  Sadly, seasons two and three were uniformly awful, completely muddled and lacking direction, and I should have given it up as a bad lot.  Yet, I’m still watching it, seemingly having forgotten how mediocre I thought it was originally and expecting it to get back to a standard that it never achieved in the first place.

Another super-hero themed show in which I’ve experienced a similar feeling is Smallville.  I watched the first few seasons of the young-Superman based show with some interest, but somewhere during season 3 I gave up on it.  I just couldn’t bear the poorly handled will-they-won’t-they relationship between Clark and Lana.  Years later, I caught up by watching repeats on T4, on Sunday afternoons, and quite enjoyed seasons 5 and 6.  Then came season 7, perhaps the worst season of US TV that I’ve watched in its entirety.  I won’t go in to all the reasons why it was so bad now, suffice to say that it was a stinker. And yet, I still watched season 8, which was an improvement in parts, but still had its exasperating moments.  I will watch season 9, whenever we get it over here, purely because I’ve watched 8 full seasons (more or less) of the programme and it would feel weird to give up with just one or two seasons to go.

The current master of this phenomenon is True Blood, HBO’s vampires in the deep south drama.  It’s a interesting concept and is obviously well made, with a good cast.  I still don’t really like it.  Nothing seems to have happened and I don’t care about any of the characters (besides the gay vampire chained to a sunbed), and by all rights I should stop watching.  But, I’ve watched 9 of the 12 episodes in season 1, and it seems a waste to give up now.  I’ve also heard that season 2 is an improvement and so I’ll probably end up watching that too.  Completely mental.

The least offensive programmes fall in to the category ‘programmes that I like but wouldn’t cry if I never saw again and wouldn’t contemplate watching twice’, some recent examples being: Chuck, Life, Psych and A Town Called Eureka. How many shows are you watching that would fit in this category?

I don’t know if I’ve been able to prove my point, I’m not sure that I even have a point.  From a personal view, I don’t really know what I should do about it.  Should I become harsher and stop watching any programmes that I’m not enjoying?  It seems the obvious solution, but, if it’s so obvious, why am I not doing that already?  I suspect I’ll just end up carrying on as I have been, but I’ll just be more aware that what I am doing is slightly mental.  I also hope that this doesn’t come across as an attack on US TV, the fact that I watch so many American programmes is why I’m writing about them and not British soap operas.  I just wonder if certain British TV shows would be more highly-rated if they ran over more episodes.

No Time To Blog: Day 6 – TV

I finished watching The Human Bird (Channel 4); I was frightened just as a viewer. It was a great piece of television, if you get chance to see it you should.

Finally got around to watching episode one of Spiral season 2 (BBC4), the French crime drama. With it being three years since the first series I’d forgotten half of the chatcters which meant I spent much of the programme saying, ‘Oh, I’d forgotten about him.’ I remembered the ginger lawyer lady but couldn’t recall what part she had played in the previous series other than being a bit dodgy. I really enjoyed it though, but I do wonder if I’d still be watching if it was an English programme.

No Time To Blog: Day 5 – What I Watched Last Night

After a long day blogging and looking for an internet stream to watch football I decided to spend last night watching some telly.  It may not be a very exciting way to spend your Saturday night, but I happen to like watching TV.

The main thing that I wanted to watch was the first episode of French drama, Spiral, as I’ve been waiting three years for the second series to make an appearance.  I soon decided against it as watching a programme with subtitles would have required too much concentration.  Instead, I watched Friday’s Derren Brown special, How To Control The Nation.  It was an enjoyable hour’s entertainment and built up to the ‘special film’ that would stick you to your chair.  Suffice to say, I didn’t stick to my chair.  I felt a mixture of disappointment and relief; half of me would have loved to have been stuck, but the other half would have been horrified that I’d been ‘controlled’.

After that, I thought I’d give the Coen brother’s Burn After Reading a try, which I had recorded last week.  I managed to get about ten minutes in to it before I had to switch off in boredom.  Looking for a bit of light-hearted popcorn TV to compensate, I watched this week’s episode of A Town Called Eureka.  It was a silly episode (but then, aren’t they all?), where the town got frozen solid and featured some very dodgy special effects.  I do like the new relationship between Jack and Tess, despite the fact that they’ve just completely dropped the years of build up in his relationship with Allison.  Jaime Ray Newman has done a great job of making Tess a likeable character that feels like she has been around since the show started.

I recorded both X Factor shows with little intent of watching them and deleted both after about 3 minutes.  Not even Holly Willoughby can keep me watching The Xtra Factor, so the rot must definitely have set in.

It was a result and a surprise that Liverpool were the first match on Match of the Day.  It was clearly an exciting match, but there was some shocking defending by the Reds and it needs to be sorted out pronto.  Listening on the radio, as I mentioned here, really didn’t do the game justice;  I didn’t even pick up on the good run and cross by Ryan Babel which led to Torres’ second goal.

The last thing I watched was this week’s Chuck.  It actually held together really well as an episode, one of the best so far, but the will-they-won’t-they stuff between Chuck and Sarah is really starting to bug me.  They should really make a decision on what direction they’re heading in with it and stick with it.

All in all, it was a decent effort and I managed to claw back some space on my planner.  Now I just have to get myself psyched up enough to watch Spiral.

Ink! Alter Egos Exposed

Last night, I watched the first episode of the ten part series, Ink! Alter Egos Exposed, looking at the history of comic books, on Sky Arts. As a life long comic fan, it’s a rare treat to see them being given serious treatment on television.

The first episode, entitled ‘Heroes’, was watchable enough, despite the portentous music playing throughout, as it took an opening look at super-heroes. The programme’s approach was somewhat scattershot; as well as the obvious inclusion of Superman and Batman, there was also coverage of Giffen and DeMatteis’ Justice League and the obscure Dial ‘H’ for Hero. I was a big fan of Justice League International in my teens, but it does seem a bit of a bizarre choice. The episode ended with a spotlight on Scottish writer, Grant Morrison, which can only be seen as a bonus.

I’m not entirely sure who the show is aimed at; there doesn’t seem to be anything revelatory for comics’ fans, and I’m not sure it was in depth enough for those with no knowledge of the medium. It’s worth sticking with though, and if you’re new to comic books, then you should give it a try.

Man on The Wire

In a recent post about watching the final episode of The West Wing, Gone West (Wing), I stated that I didn’t agree with many pundits opinion that it was the greatest TV show ever.   In the comments section of the post I was asked what is the greatest show on the television, and despite the inherent arrogance in answering such a subjective question with any conviction, only one programme sprang to mind: The Wire.

It struck me that if I had written a post about something that I considered  not to be the best, then I had no justification for not writing a post about something that I do think is the best.  It’s not as though I hadn’t thought about writing about The Wire previous to that, it’s just that when something has been so universally praised, how do you find something new to say about it?  Well, as I type this sentence, I’m not sure that I do have something new to say, or even have a unique angle in which to say something old, but I’ve started, so I’ll finish.

Inevitably, as for the majority of highly acclaimed programmes made in this decade, The Wire was made by HBO in the States, and it ran between between 2002 and 2008.  It’s five seasons ran for 60 episodes, and, in that time, creators David Simon and Ed Burns blessed us with a masterpiece.  So, what is it about?

It’s not so easy to describe The Wire.  If you had to try (which I do), you’d start by saying that it was a cop show set in Baltimore, which follows a police detail’s attempts to bring down the city’s endemic drugs trade.  If you were to leave the description there, anyone who had seen the show would recognise it, but would also be screaming, ‘Yes! But it’s so much more!!’  And it is SO much more.

The first thing that separates it from the norm is that it spends as much time inhabiting the world of the drug dealers as it does of that of the cops.  We see life on the streets from the bottom up, from the desperate users, to the street level muscle, to the ruthless bosses.  And in all that time, each character is treated as a real three-dimensional person, with no easy depictions of clear cut evil.  On the flip side to this, the police are equally human, each carrying their own distinctive, and real, flaws.  The characterisation in this show is second to none, but more of that later.

Season one focuses on ‘the detail’, and its building of a case against Avon Barksdale’s drugs empire.  Each subsequent season then introduces a new theme, and a new set of characters, which are explored in addition to those already established.  What other show has the nerve to introduce so many characters?  I’m struggling to find an exact figure on it, but there could well be 40 distinct ‘main’ characters over the 60 episodes, and you’re sure to remember every one of them.  In season two we are introduced to the city’s downtrodden dock workers, exploring the lengths that the unions will go to for their men.  Season three delves in to the machinations down at City Hall, and shows the deal making and back stabbing of local politics.  Season four follows the lives of four teenagers and their attempts to negotiate the over-stretched schools system.  Finally, season five gives us an insight in to the world of the press, and their analogous relationship to the police (it also features an outrageous plot line that I won’t say any more about).

What’s even more impressive is that each season can be seen as a distinct story, with each episode merely a chunk of that overall plot.  It is extremely brave to do away with cliffhangers and the tricks of episodic TV, but it really pays off.  The Wire is the only show that has made me angry when an episode ends, so desperate was I to see the next.  How do they do that without a cliffhanger?

I’ve not mentioned individual characters yet, nor the performances that helped create them.  Well, the acting is uniformly excellent, and with so many actors to choose from, it would be churlish to pick any one out.  I’m loath to pick out any favourite characters, as to anyone who hasn’t watched it, it would be meaningless, and to anyone who has seen it, then you have your own list (I’m guessing most of those lists have Omar on them).

Maybe the final thing I should mention is that it is a show that doesn’t compromise and it doesn’t pander to the casual viewer.  Street language and police jargon are not explained, and you have to pick them up as you go along.  The plot is slowly teased out as the season progresses, and there are no happy endings or easy answers.  It almost makes watching it sound like a chore, but it in fact just makes the experience all the more rewarding.

My personal involvement with The Wire started when I watched a review on Charlie Brooker’s excellent BBC4 show, Screenwipe, in which he gave his strongest possible recommendation (I’ve just watched that review on Youtube, and it makes me want to go and watch The Wire even more), but since I’m not a big fan of buying DVD box sets, I instead regularly checked its UK home, FX, in case of repeats.  In 2007 I got lucky as that’s what happened, and the repeats were immediately preceded by a Charlie Brooker special, Tapping The Wire.  In it, he interviewed cast and crew, and travelled to Baltimore to talk to some of the locals.  He also talked to some celebrity fans, who, to a man (and I think they were all men), said that The Wire was the best TV show ever.  Now, whenever I hear that something goes off in my brain that says, ‘they’re wrong, it’s DEFINITELY not the best show ever’, and so it was with a bit of awkward trepidation that I approached the first episode.  At the end of the series opener, my unfounded fears were allayed, and by episode 3 or 4 I was hooked.  FX then showed the full 60 episodes weekly, and it was a glorious year in my television watching life.

FX are currently repeating The Wire again weekly, presumably to compete with BBC2′s recent acquisition of terrestrial rights, and I am once again watching.  We’re currently at the start of season three, and I’m enjoying each episode as much as the first time.  The deeply complex nature of the show makes multiple viewings not only enjoyable, but maybe essential.

I’m quite happy to admit that I didn’t find anything new to say about The Wire, but I didn’t really expect to.  I also expect I’ve missed out some obvious aspect of the show that is better than other TV shows, but, with so much on offer, things are going to fall through the cracks.  I could have saved myself a lot of time by summing the show up like this; what’s so good about The Wire?

Everything.

Chuck Versus the Third Dimension

This week saw Virgin 1 broadcast ‘Chuck Versus the Third Dimension’, a 3-d episode of their spy-based comedy-drama, Chuck.  I said in a previous post, Chuck 3-D, that I’d discuss it once it had been on, so here am I.

The basic premise for the series is this; Chuck Bartowski is an intelligent twenty-something, who, following false allegations of cheating during university (and subsequent expulsion), finds himself working in an electronics store, the Buy More, as an ‘IT geek’.  His mundane life is disrupted when his old college room-mate, now a spy, implants the only copy of a critical CIA computer\database in to his brain.  With Chuck now the only way that the US Government can access this information, he is deemed an ‘asset’, and is assigned two handlers; CIA babe, Sarah Walker, and NSA nutcase, John Casey.  With Casey undercover at the Buy More, and Sarah posing as his girlfriend, Chuck is drawn in to mission after dangerous mission and hilarity ensues.

Chuck Versus the Third Dimension was the twelfth episode of the second season, and with the series only just escaping cancellation, a 3-d episode could be seen as something of a desperate gimmick.  As I stated in Chuck 3-D, I’ve never seen any 3d films using the old style red/blue glasses before, and so I was definitely intrigued.  The result, I felt, was something of a mixed bag.  Some of the effects really popped, and looked great; others, in particular anything flying ‘out’ of the screen, were incredibly lame.  The most noticeable thing about the whole experience was the terrible headache that it induced, and the fact that I felt like an absolute idiot wearing the glasses (with one of my cats totally obsessed by them).  That said, it has left me wondering how good the new 3d cinema experience is, especially with James Cameron’s Avatar threatening to blow everything else out of the water.  I probably wouldn’t have bothered going to the cinema to see it, but after getting a taste of what 3d can do, I’m much more likely to go.

While I’m here, I might as well tell you my general feelings on Chuck as a series.  Overall, it’s quite a fun show, with Zachary Levi giving a great central performance as Chuck.  Levi’s portrayal hits all the right notes, you believe in Chuck’s lack of self esteem that has led him to settle for the Buy More, while at the same time, his inherent capability and intelligence shine through without being overplayed.  There is a subtle hero worship of Chuck by the other Buy More employees that really rings true.  Levi is also a very expressive actor and comically displays Chuck’s struggle with spy-work to perfection.

He is ably supported by Yvonne Strahovski as Sarah Walker, Chuck’s will-they-won’t-they love interest, and Adam Baldwin as John Casey, always annoyed with Chuck, but still somehow really likeable.  I’m slightly less enamoured with the other Buy More staff, who aren’t bad as such, I just find their ‘hilarious’ sub-plots really tedious and a waste of airtime.   The cast is rounded out by Chuck’s sister, Ellie (Sarah Lancaster), and future brother-in-law ‘Captain Awesome’ (Ryan McPartlin), both doctors, and a ‘perfect’ couple, who Chuck lives with.  It’s to the show’s credit that both these characters come across as essentially nice, it would have been much easier to go a different direction with them (especially with someone with the nickname ‘Captain Awesome’).

Overall, I do like Chuck, but hand on heart, I don’t think I’d miss it if it was to be cancelled.  It’s a fun show, a good light-hearted romp, but despite all the positive qualities that I’ve listed, it somehow misses something.  The Buy More sub-plots don’t help, the characters there are a bit one-dimensional, and the wacky storylines usually aren’t funny.  The will-they-won’t-they romance between Chuck and Sarah is not always handled great; a recent storyline saw Chuck meet up with and fall for an ex-girlfriend, and he didn’t give a moments hesitation about Sarah, despite supposedly being madly in love with her.  How do you come back from that?

I think that the main problem is that, as an audience, we’ve become spoiled by series that have an ongoing plot running throughout a season, and so when you watch a show that’s largely episodic, there feels to be something missing.  That said, if you want to kill an hour with some light hearted action and comedy, you could do a lot worse than watch Chuck.

Missing The X Factor

So, I went round to my brother’s house last night, just after seven, and as I glanced at the TV I thought, ‘Hmmm, that looks like The X Factor’.  And it was The X Factor.  Why had I not been informed that it was starting again?

If I was being snobby I’d call The X Factor a guilty pleasure, but I’m not, so I won’t.  It’s an out-and-out entertainment show, and should be judged as such; it should not be compared disparagingly with great works of fiction.  That said, as I watched it last night (without the benefit of being able to fast forward using Sky Plus), I was completely underwhelmed.  Sure, there were still moments of great comedy, such as:

JOHN: I’m John!

EDWARD: I’m Edward!

JOHN & EDWARD: Together, we are… John and Edward!

There was also classic cases of exploitation such as the sisters with tiny faces on fat heads, one of whom was auditioning for the third time.  We all know that there is a preliminary round, so why are they letting the poor girl through again? This time with the added bonus of  being humiliated in front of two thousand people.  Luckily, they seemed too thick to notice.

But for all this, I was uninterested.  I did Sky Plus the late night repeat (and The Xtra Factor), and skimmed through them this morning.  I must have watched about 10 minutes of two and a half hours of programming.  Maybe it’s the change to a live audience in the auditions that is spoiling it for me, or maybe the format has run its course.  It’s more than likely though that I’ll be bored for a few weeks, get drawn in a bit and then be gripped when they get to boot camp.  It is usually claimed that the auditions are the best bit, but, actually, I disagree.  I think that people tend to say that because it’s easy to sneer and be ‘ironic’ at the auditions, and therefore it’s ‘cooler’.

The only other thing that I would point out is that The Xtra Factor tends to be a better show than the main ITV1 programme.  This is in large part down to the talents of Holly Willoughby, who apart from being incredibly lovely, is extremely likeable, good at her job and brings a sense of fun to proceedings.  She so clearly overshadows Dermot O’Leary (who I generally quite like), that it’s bordering on embarrassing.

Anyway, I may be around after next weeks show, or I might not! See you then (or not).

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 428 other followers